India's Slow Growth
"With India, Long-Term Profit Potential Trumps Near-Term Concerns"
India remains a great long-term profit play. But global
investors should beware of the near-term exuberance that followed that nation's weekend elections. The Indian
market zoomed 17% on Monday on the news that the Congress Party had been re-elected with an increased majority.
It's certainly true that some of the other alternatives - for example a weak leftist Third Force coalition
including the spectacularly corrupt Mayawati Kumari (India's richest politician, a keenly fought title) -
would have been worse. Nevertheless, you have to remember that the Congress Party (also known as the India National
Congress, and referred to by its initials, INC) is responsible for most of India's woes, both recently and in the
60 years since independence, and that putting it back into power is unlikely to bring much of a step forward -
economically speaking.
Condemned to Slow Growth
For more than 40 years after independence - albeit with one short exception - India
was ruled by the Congress party and condemned to slow economic growth. Then, after 1991, then finance minister
Manmohan Singh began opening up the economy. However, growth had already slowed again in the mid 1990s and it
was only under the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government of Atal Bihari Vajpayee in 1998-2004 that
India removed many of its longstanding statist obstacles to growth, and began to enjoy economic growth rates
comparable to those of China. The Vajpayee government was rejected by the Indian electorate in 2004, in a stunning
act of electoral ingratitude second only to Britain's shocking 1945 rejection of Winston Churchill, who had helped
engineer the Allied victory in World War II.
Since 2004, India's Congress Party has been back in power under Singh - this time
as prime minister - in a coalition with the left. The nation's leadership has made endless promises of reform, but
has really accomplished very little. Economic growth has continued to be rapid, largely because of the Vajpayee
government's reforms, which were particularly extensive during that administration's last two years in power in
2002-2004. The Congress Party's main achievements were run-ups in both public spending and the fiscal deficit, the
latter of which seems likely to run at a rate of about 12% of gross domestic product (GDP) for the 2009-2010 period
- if state deficits are included. By the 2009 election, Vajpayee had retired, and his successor as BJP leader -
L.K. Advani - was both old and associated with the party's Hindu nationalist wing, so it's not surprising that
the BJP failed to make progress. The collapse of support in the election for the mostly leftist third parties is
itself a good sign, making a swing back to the BJP under new leadership more likely whenever the next election
occurs, probably in 2014. In the five intervening years until that happens, India will have to endure a Congress
Party government, either under current Prime Minister Singh, or possibly under newcomer Rahul Gandhi -
grandson of former Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, which would make him the latest member of the Nehru/Gandhi dynasty
to hold that office.
Don't Expect ReformsCongress' claim to
reformism becomes especially thin when you look at the party's allies. For example, West Bengal's Trinamool
Congress led the violent opposition to Tata Motors Ltd.'s (NYSE ADR: TTM) "Nano" automobile plant in that
state. Tata had managed to do a deal with Bengal's Communist state government to produce the revolutionary $2,000
car, but the Trinamool Congress was able to force Tata to relocate the plant to Gujarat at a cost of more than $500
million, delaying the full production of the Nano by more than a year. In the recent elections, Trinamool, in
alliance with the national Congress Party, was rewarded with 26 of West Bengal's 42 parliamentary seats, and its
leadership will doubtless be part of the new government. The new government's policy is thus unlikely to be very
reformist, especially as it rejoices in the support of the egregious Mayawati. In welcoming the election win, Prime
Minister Singh indicated further areas where India's public spending and transfer payments needed to be increased,
with no suggestion that privatization or reining back the immense public-sector deficit were a priority. It's thus
likely that the Indian government will continue as an ever-increasing drag on the economy, with a funding crisis
possible if public spending increases too much. In such an environment, it is unlikely that India's 8% average
growth rate of the last five years can continue; the average of the next five years is much more likely to be in
the 4% to 5% range, possibly with an acute foreign exchange crisis at some point. There's no question that India's
stock market - trading at a Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of roughly 20 - is expecting much better than this. That
means it's time to step back.
When - and How - to Make Your Play
Once the euphoria has dissipated, and the Indian market has dropped at least 30%
from its current level, to below 10,000 on the Bombay Stock Exchange's Sensex Index, Indian shares will once again
be worth looking at, if only because of the country's immense long-term-growth potential - an upside great enough
to overcome even the immense drag of most of its governmental shortcomings. At that point, the heavy capital
investors such as Tata Motors should be avoided, because of the unpredictability of capital availability in a
capital market whose savings can be sucked into the government's immense maw. Look instead at such
non-capital-intensive exporters (the exchange rate is likely to remain relatively weak) as the software company
Infosys Technologies Ltd. (Nasdaq ADR: INFY), or global pharmaceuticals producer Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd.
(NYSE ADR: RDY). Both stocks are currently somewhat expensive, with Infosys trading at about 18 times the consensus
analyst estimate for forward earnings, and Dr. Reddy's roughly 14 times. But both stocks should be purchased for
long-term growth during periods when investor enthusiasm for the Indian market has had a chance to cool
down.
|